To answer this question, we revisit a exam lane with an approximately eight-kilometre straight, high-speed banked dilemma and sum length of 21 kilometres.
The initial to seem is a Porsche 911 Turbo S – a sports automobile that masters a balancing act between bland driveability and monumental acceleration. Its 3.8-litre turbo horizontally against engine in a behind produces 580hp (Fuel expenditure total 9.1 l/100 km; CO2 emissions 212 g/km). Speeds of over 300km/h are no problem for this high-performance athlete.
The 911 is subsequently overtaken by nothing other than a Carrera GT. Its 612hp V10 engine accelerates from 0 to 100km/h in a small 3.9 seconds, emphasising a racing genes of this mythological super sports car. It is also a initial standard-production automobile whose monocoque framework and subframe are done wholly of carbon-fibre reinforced cosmetic (CFRP).
For a subsequent candidate, we take another step behind in history: a Porsche 959 S. In a mid-1980s, a Porsche 959 was a initial indication to be nicknamed “super sports car”. The reason: a 2.8-litre six-cylinder horizontally against engine done a 959 a world’s fastest sports car. The 959 S took this to nonetheless another level. The 29 units constructed generated even some-more energy – adult to 515hp.
The subsequent hopeful brings spectators behind to a benefaction day: a Porsche 911 GT2 RS. This two-time Nürburgring-Nordschleife record-holder is pristine motorsport for a road, and also demonstrates a strengths on a prolonged straights. The 700hp (Fuel expenditure total 11.8 l/100 km; CO2 emissions 269 g/km) slumbering within a 3.2-litre horizontally against engine mortar a motorist from 0 to 100km/h in usually 2.8 seconds.
In a lead, however, is another record-holder. The 918 Spyder shows usually what a total hybrid energy of 887hp can achieve. With an acceleration from 0 to 100km/h in usually 2.6 seconds, it’s no warn that a 918 Spyder wins this Top 5 ranking.
911 Turbo S: Fuel expenditure total 9.1 l/100 km; CO2 emissions 212 g/km
911 GT2 RS: Fuel expenditure total 11.8 l/100 km; CO2 emissions 269 g/km